Embedded Computation Architectures for Autonomy in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).

This paper addresses the challenge of embedded computing resources required by future autonomous Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Based on an analysis of the required onboard functions that will lead to higher levels of autonomy, we look at most common UAS tasks to first propose a classification of UAS tasks considering categories such as flight, navigation, safety, mission and executing entities such as human, offline machine, embedded system. We then analyse how a given combination of tasks can lead to higher levels of autonomy by defining an autonomy level. We link UAS applications, the tasks required by those applications, the autonomy level and the implications on computing resources to achieve that autonomy level. We provide insights on how to define a given autonomy level for a given application based on a number of tasks. Our study relies on the state-of-the-art hardware and software implementations of the most common tasks currently used by UAS, also expected tasks according to the nature of their future missions. We conclude that current computing architectures are unlikely to meet the autonomy requirements of future UAS. Our proposed approach is based on dynamically reconfigurable hardware that offers benefits in computational performance and energy usage. We believe that UAS designers must now consider the embedded system as a masterpiece of the system.

Do high risk patients alter their lifestyle to reduce risk of colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) may be reduced by healthy lifestyle behaviours. We determined the extent of self-reported lifestyle changes in people at increased risk of CRC, and the association of these reports with anxiety, risk and knowledge-based variables. METHODS: We randomly selected 250 participants who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy for family history of CRC. A telephone interview was conducted, recording demographics and family history. Self-reported lifestyle change due to thoughts about CRC across a range of dietary and lifestyle variables was assessed on a four-point scale. Participants' perceptions of the following were recorded: risk factor knowledge, personal risk, and worry due to family history. General anxiety was assessed using the GAD-7 scale. Ordinal logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted results. RESULTS: There were 148 participants (69% response). 79.7% reported at least one healthy change. Change in diet and physical activity were most frequently reported (fiber, 63%; fruit and vegetables, 54%; red meat, 47%; physical activity, 45%), with consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and body weight less likely (tobacco, 25%; alcohol, 26%; weight 31%). People were more likely to report healthy change with lower levels of generalized anxiety, higher worry due to family history, or greater perceived knowledge of CRC risk factors. Risk perception and risk due to family history were not associated with healthy changes. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported lifestyle changes due to thoughts about CRC were common. Lower general anxiety levels, worries due to family history, and perceived knowledge of risk factors may stimulate healthy changes.

Perceived risks and benefits of surveillance colonoscopy in people undergoing surveillance for family history of colorectal cancer.

AIM: To determine perceived risks and benefits of colonoscopy surveillance among patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy due to family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: We conducted a standardised phone interview of 250 randomly selected people who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy at Dunedin Hospital. We assessed perceptions of colonoscopy effectiveness, complication rates, and CRC risk. RESULTS: We included 148 (69%) participants. Most felt well informed about surveillance (66.7%), but many wanted further information (63.2%). Most accurately estimated complication rates (discomfort: Common/Uncommon 70.3%; pain: Rare/Uncommon 58.8%; bleeding: Rare/Uncommon 72.3%; perforation: Very rare 62.8%), and benefits (mean reduction in risk of CRC 72.6% and death 76.2%). Most (55.1%) over-estimated their CRC risk. 13.5% thought perforation never occurred, and 12.8% thought colonoscopy either completely prevented, or had no effect on risk of developing or dying from CRC. Patients giving unrealistic estimates had similar demographics and clinical variables to the wider cohort. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest current surveillance education adequately communicates risks and benefits to most patients. A minority have unrealistic views and further education may be indicated.